The original question was: I have a question about the twin paradox. Is it true that faster aging of the twin who stayed at home happens only when the other twin’s spaceship is accelerating/deceleration (btw, does it matter whether he is accelerating or decelerating?)? Consequently, do they age at the same rate when the spaceship moves inertially?
Physicist: The very short answer is: geometry works different in spacetime than it does in just space.
The twin paradox is a result from special relativity that states that if one person, Alice, remains “stationary” and another person, Bob, takes any kind of round trip, then the stationary Alice will experience more time. The twin paradox isn’t a paradox at all, it’s just strange and off-putting (like twins).
In relativity (that is to say: “in reality”) there’s no difference between being stationary and having smooth (non-accelerating) movement. On the surface of it, the only difference between Alice and Bob is that, in order to return home, Bob has to accelerate (turn around) at some point. So is acceleration the secret to the twin paradox? Nope.
In all of the pictures that follow the “time direction” is up, and one of the (three) space directions is left/right.
The trick is: spacetime doesn’t obey the “triangle inequality”. As a result, the bendier a path is, the shorter it is (that shouldn’t make any sense, so please read on).
The equation for distance that we’re used to is: (this is just the Pythagorean theorem). But you find that when you start involving time and movement, this isn’t a particularly good measure of the distance between two points. Specifically, it’s different for different observers because of length contraction.
It so happens that the effects of length contraction and time dilation cancel each other perfectly, so that we can use a new (better) measure for spacetime distance, called the “Interval” or “spacetime interval” or “Lorentz interval”:
(as often as not the sign on the right hand side is reversed, not to worry)
The advantage to the Interval is that, no matter what, the Interval between any two points in spacetime (two locations and times) is always the same, despite relativistic weirdness. Here’s another bonus! The Interval of a path is the same as the amount of time experienced on that path!
No one every really feels like their own position is changing, so:
Now all that’s left is to draw a picture and do a little calculating. Here’s an example situation from Alice’s perspective, and then Bob’s (initial) perspective. The difference between Alice and Bob’s velocity is 0.6C (60% of light speed).